I included an excerpt from a letter written by Mercedes fabulous Bernad ... draw your own conclusion (or conclusions).
exist in Castilian active participles as derived from the verb tenses. The active participle of the verb attack is "attacker", the out is "outgoing", the singing is "singer" and its very existence, "exists." What is the verb to be? Is "entity" which means "he who has authority" ultimately "the one". So when we name the person that denotes the ability to exert action expressed by the verb, we add to this the ending "-nt."
Thus, presiding, called "president" and never "president," regardless of gender (male or female) of performing the action.
Similarly, we say "chapel", not "burning", it says "student", not "student", it says "independent" and not "independent", "patient", not "patient"; " leader, "not leading"; "resident", not "resident".
And now, the question our politicians and many journalists (men and women, that men who practice journalism are not "journalism"), "misuse of language for ideological reasons or out of ignorance of the Grammar of Language English?. I think for two reasons. Moreover, I believe that ignorance leads them to apply the same ideological patterns and automatic application of these patterns makes them more ignorant ideological them (and their followers).
0 comments:
Post a Comment